Just as an FYI ... I believe Object Desktop is also know as ODNT due to the fact that OD was *first* released as a software product for the now defunct OS/2 operating system. During the switchover to fully supporting Windows Stardock needed some way to distinguish the two distinct products, hence: OD = Object Desktop for OS/2 ODNT = Object Desktop for Windows YMMV chekmarx
All you need to do is open "Control Panel" and change your "User" setup for logging in via the typical Windows method. I know this doesn't help Stardock with fixing the buglet but it will at least allow you to make the change you desire for now. HTH
And some of us users have been along for the ride as well ! Myself, first as an ardent OS/2 supporter who when I discovered Object Desktop for OS/2 thought I died and had gone to heaven ! OD for OS/2 was * that * great of an application. These days I still support Stardock by keeping my OD for Windows subscription up-to-date, but believe it or not I am still running OS/2 as my primary operating-system. Today though, the OS is now b
> I bet you on these newer systems an old copy of OS/2 would FLY much like windows 95 ! I have a AMD Athlon XP based system with 512 megs of DDR333 RAM and OS/2 indeed absolutely ROCKS on it. I'm also running eComStation (the latest incarnation of OS/2 from Serenity Systems) and it too runs great. That's one of the reasons it's so difficult to drop it and change over to Windows XP. Aside from losing the WPS performance would
I know a few others have already commented on their positive experiences with Verizon DSL but I feel I have to add my 2-cents in as well. If only to counter the unfair representation that started this thread. Now, I'm not saying he is lying, but IMO it is grossly unfair and flat wrong to negatively judge Verizon's DSL service by the experiences of *ONE* user in one area of the country. I too have had Verizon DSL service for over three years and literally NEVER had a problem.<b
Stardock Forums
WinCustomize Forums