TerribleNate

Very excited for any AI work!

Are you talking about weight of the reviews? This is the first I’ve heard of that.

[quote who="Wildstar2236" reply="63" id="3870202"] NatEff3ct I know exactly what you meant and why I replied to the way I did, logic class not needed. [/quote] And in the

[quote who="Teatime02" reply="62" id="3870201"] ITT: a bunch of steam fanboys cutting off their noses to spite their face. While you boycott a service just because "angsty fortnite fanboys", I'm going to be happily enjoy SoSE2 in peace. Steam takes a way higher % than Epic does, giving stardock more income to develope this game. I'm a SoSE fanboy, and tha'ts all that matters to me. [/quote] We’ve already covered this, 30% of a much larger pie is a lot mo

[quote who="Wildstar2236" reply="60" id="3869902"] Quoting NateDiggs33, reply 59 Well, that is quite the false equivalency you shot out there. So to you "principles" only exist when it's life or death? Not littering can be based on principles. Holding the door open for someone can be based on principles. None of that has a

[quote who="Wildstar2236" reply="56" id="3869746"] Quoting NatEff3ct, reply 55 Quoting Freyja_Bjorn, reply 54 <

[quote who="Freyja_Bjorn" reply="54" id="3869744"] But I don't care, I want the game. It's as simple as that, if you actually support the game you'd suck a little epic c* for it. [/quote] You derailed your argument with the start of that

[quote who="Wildstar2236" reply="49" id="3868579"] Quoting NatEff3ct, reply 47 there is a lot more to it than that like they’re anti-customer business practices, their business plan is not sustainable in the long-term, flat out quote by the CEO and oh let’s not forget that PRC owns 45% of the company . . .<br /

[quote who="Freyja_Bjorn" reply="46" id="3868532"] So I get it, you're manchildren and won't install another launcher. [/quote] there is a lot more to it than that like they’re anti-customer business practices, their business plan is not sustainable in the long-term, flat out quote by the CEO and oh let’s not forget that PRC owns 45% of the company . . .

[quote who="Wildstar2236" reply="38" id="3868016"] Quoting Gerdofal, reply 36 I found this quote from another thread on this subject: Thread: How long Epic exclusivity will last? <br /

[quote who="Wildstar2236" reply="31" id="3867878"] Quoting NatEff3ct, reply 28 Quoting StormingKiwi, reply 27 <br

[quote who="StormingKiwi" reply="27" id="3867761"] Quoting Wildstar2236, reply 26 As far as Epic and Steam, I think they already said the final version will be available on Steam so if you wait, you can get it. Only the technical Preview is on Epic. Gal Civ 4 entered early access o

They probably don't know about G4 a lot of people don't . . .

We all know the reasoning behind Ironclad’s decision, that decision makes sense, now whether it makes sense in the face of reality can be debated, it is what it is. It is also possible that ironclad would not have been able to continue as a company without an upfront cash infusion regardless of whether it would hurt long-term profits. I just wish EG was a better company with a better product and a better business plan. 😔

Hello, you should consider posting over on the Steam forums. There is a small group of people over there talking about how this store switch is a good thing because of the revenue split, not understanding the difference in total revenue between the two stores, and at the same time also saying it’s great, because steam is a monopoly all while not understanding what a monopoly is lol. A monopoly being a majority of the total revenue in a market, with effort and funds being put toward maki

It’s not about disliking EGS or liking them less than Valve, it’s about disliking their customer unfriendly business methods and the poor quality of the platform from the customer perspective.