Hi all,

A few weeks ago, I started playing Galactic Civilizations IV again after taking a break of about a year and a half. I’ve been playing the franchise since GalCiv II, and I’m happy to see that the game has made big strides in many areas. That said, there are still a few issues that feel very similar to how they were 1.5 years ago.

For context:

• I always play without sectors, which is just my personal preference.

• Map size varies.

• I play on Galaxy difficulty – Incredible.

Apologies if my feedback below is a bit unstructured—I’m listing things as they come to mind.

1. Technology Trading
In my opinion, AI opponents still struggle to judge the actual situational value of technologies.
For instance, since I play without sectors, the Subspace Scanning tech becomes irrelevant. But if I research it early enough, I can usually trade it to an AI for 5x its value or more, even though it’s useless in a single-sector setup. The AI seems unaware that the tech offers no real benefit in the current context.

This also applies to military techs—for example, Planetary Mobilization, Invasion, and similar. These can often be traded for a massive return, even if the AI has no use for them at the time or isn’t in a position to make use of them.
Overall, the AI doesn’t seem to evaluate tech value based on galaxy settings or strategic timing.

2. Databank Graphs – Especially Military Strength
The military strength graph seems to have a major influence on AI behavior.
If I appear weak in that graph, AI civilizations become aggressive pretty quickly—which makes sense strategically. But once war begins, it often turns out the graph was highly inaccurate, and I'm actually stronger than expected. It feels like the AI is making major decisions based on unreliable data.

This also happens with the technology graph. I often appear average or even near the bottom, even though I seem to have the most techs (judging from what's available in trade). But the military graph has the biggest impact and seems especially misleading.

3. Warfare & Combat AI
Without diving into too much detail, the AI doesn't feel very smart or strategic in warfare.
Its decisions are often simplistic, and it doesn’t seem to adapt or coordinate in a way that poses a serious threat—even on higher difficulties.

4. Strategic Resource Distribution
In many new games, the placement of strategic resources feels uneven.
Often I’ll see large clusters of just one type—like only Durathium, or only Elerium—with little diversity nearby.

5. Late-Game Interaction & Depth
As the game progresses, I often feel a lack of meaningful interaction with the AI.
Diplomacy tends to become static, and there’s little sign of dynamic relationships or complex behavior between civilizations. The sense of a living galaxy with shifting alliances and rivalries is still missing. More mid- and late-game diplomacy options or events would add a lot of depth.

Despite these issues, I’m enjoying my return to GalCiv IV. It’s clear that the game has improved significantly since I last played, and I’m looking forward to future updates. Hopefully, some of these points can help make the experience even better.

Thanks for reading!