I own (as of August 2011) the top end Samsung (active 3D) and top end LG (passive 3D) televisions. Just bought them both this Summer.
The Samsung’s active 3D glasses are state of the art. They use bluetooth and give a stunningly sharp 3D picture.
The LG came with several pair of passive 3D.
Here’s the verdict (and frankly, I can’t imagine any sane person coming to a different conclusion because it’s not a close call): The passive is better – by far.
Yes, the active is slightly sharper. But the fact is, right now anyway, active 3D means 60hz which means flicker. Watching something on active 3D glasses for a length of time is going to give most people a headache. It’s a great demo though.
By contrast, the passive 3D is comfortable. It’s like watching 3D at the movies.
I don’t really find 3D very compelling anyway – in general. It is, however cool that both sets will convert 2D to 3D and do so quite well – remarkably well. So watching the occasional home movie on either one is nice. The active 3D is sharper but gives you a headache. The passive is less sharp but comfortable. I’d prefer comfortable.
So there you go. If there’s a future for 3D glasses, and I’m not sure there is, it’s passive.