Ok, people complain about the lack of attention to detail on the geological features of the map, as it's not completely realistic. So, in the same spirit, there should be complaints about :
1) Creatures. Are the creatures physically possible? We need to examine their dietary habits, the balance in the food chain, their favored climate conditions, etc etc. The cooperation of some creatures with others also becomes very questionable, judging from the natural instincts of those monster.
2) Lighting. Don't get me started. The lighting is SO not realistic & physically incorrect. I'd expect to see attention to detail. Nights with changing lighting due to different moon phases, and also, while on the subject, correct tide behaviour as well.
3) Vegetation. What's with those weird edgy tree branches? Artistic you say? Pfft, not physically possible, lacking. More attention to detail people, you won't see those trees anywhere in the real world, so what were you thinking, really?
...
999) Magic. What's that? Fireballs and stuff? Come on everybody knows that there aren't any fireball-wielding guys around. Really, google it.
Joke aside, people should learn to differentiate between physically possible & physically plausible and enjoy the second category because the ONLY example of the first is the real world. It's really sad if in a mythical world of magic, spells & fantastical creatures you worry about the physical improbability (not even impossibility!) of two rivers that lead to a lake.