well so true

i hope this is the last game this company made. it was the buggiest game i ever bought.

i stopped playing at the begin of july and wanted to wait for the 1.1 patch which was announced for mid of july. now its mid of october and no 1.1 yet.i havent played since and probably wont play again. if stardock would be a company in my country i would have demanded my money back or go to consumer protection.

and the biggest joke is this gamers bill of rights. i mean stardock. are u fu.king kidding us? you want to mess with us? u wanna drive away the last players too?

a lot of people complain that EA makes all the games now and got something like a monopol. i would pay 20 bucks more for the game if its made by EA. IT WOULD WORK AT LEAST

fuck stardock.

yeah i know, dont use the F word. but what do if there is no other word with the same meaning?

conte

yeah nice and for christmas we get 1.1 BETA three

gj stardock

conte

Are DT gonna stay there, or move between???

You could archive 1.05 before you upgrade How

I've got beta version right now, and i want to play online... except i don't see anyone online? Should i downgrade to v1.05?

Hey How,

I played a game of 1.096 the other day, and it seems totally stable and otherwise ready for prime time.  The one drawback is not many people seem to be online yet.  It isn't a bad time for DT to move over IF you can get some of the other clans to move too, so there will be someone to play.  I'm in New York for a week, but maybe will catch you online when I get back.

re: other posters...

Yep, this seems like a good place to comment how much I like Sins....despite a few multiplayer bugs that might have been exacerbated by no one being able to set up their firewall (not an issue for 1.096!).  I keep checking up on it months after launch to see how the new patches are coming and how the expansion will look.  Yep, sure got some good mileage out of my gaming dollar.  Glad that little team at Ironclad was willing to innovate the game, and glad those Stardock guys backed em.  And they are still supporting the game!  Sure am glad it isn't Spore.  In fact, I don't feel marginalized by game studios or even angry at the world in general!

Yeah, I think I am going to try coming over to the beta.  We have been implelementing house rules of late to make sure the game is balanced (i.e., no RA, limited use of repulse and subs, and no scuttling neutral extractors.

For a game that sold 100's of thousands the lack of players playing open games online is sad.   Went online a few days ago during prime time and had 4 players total online.  Next day 12.......

goin tell me why i can't see anyone online, Howdidudothat?

As far as I know, clickng "Join Game" will show you how many games are being formed and waiting for players--it won't show you the games that are actually being played.

Unfortunately, most Sins players only play the game offline in single player mode, so it has (undeservedly) low online multiplayer player counts.  Hopefully the 1.1 patch will increase the player counts.

I do like the multiplayer of this game more than any other game I have. I have noticed the very low amounts due to the wait of 1.1. I was online yesterday and i noticed about 38 people on their, so that means people are comming back becaues of Entrenchment which probably means v1.1.

Why doesn't it get played online?  There may be several reasons:

1. People got tired of being unable to host games without having to adjust router and firewall settings and people got tired of being unable to find hosted games (as a result of having few people who can host).

2. People got tired of the minidump crashes.

3. A great many of the people who play this game have never considered playing it in online multiplayer.  I'm not sure why.  Perhaps they're just cowards or ninnies who enjoy comp stomping the AI.